US: ADMS - Guaranteed Secure Internet (ITS)

Description

This solution is used within Canada and the U.S.. It combines standards associated with US: ADMS with those for I–I: Guaranteed Secure Internet (ITS). The US: ADMS standards include upper–layer standards required to implement interfaces with an archived data management system. The I–I: Guaranteed Secure Internet (ITS) standards include lower–layer standards that support secure communications with guaranteed delivery between ITS equipment using X.509 or IEEE 1609.2 security certificates.

Includes Standards

LevelDocNumFullNameDescription
MgmtIETF RFC 3411An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management FrameworksThis standard (RFC) defines the basic architecture for SNMPv3 and includes the definition of information objects for managing the SNMP entity's architecture.
MgmtIETF RFC 3412Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that assists in managing the message processing and dispatching subsystem of an SNMP entity.
MgmtIETF RFC 3413Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) ApplicationsThis standard (RFC) includes MIBs that allow for the configuration and management of remote Targets, Notifications, and Proxys.
MgmtIETF RFC 3414User–based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that assists in configuring and managing the user–based security model.
MgmtIETF RFC 3415View–based Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) contains a MIB that supports the configuration and management of the View–based access control model of SNMP.
MgmtIETF RFC 3416Version 2 of the Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) defines the message structure and protocol operations used by SNMPv3.
MgmtIETF RFC 3418Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)This standard (RFC) defines the MIB to configure and manage an SNMP entity.
MgmtIETF RFC 4293Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP)This standard (RFC) defines the MIB that manages an IP entity.
SecurityIETF RFC 5280Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) ProfileThis standard (RFC) defines how to use X.509 certificates for secure communications over the Internet.
SecurityIETF RFC 8446The Transport Layer Security (TLS) ProtocolThis standard (RFC) specifies Version 1.3 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. The TLS protocol provides communications security over the Internet. The protocol allows client/server applications to communicate in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, or message forgery.
ITS Application EntityASTM E2259–03aStandard Guide for Archiving and Retrieving ITS–Generated DataThis guide deals in general with the questions of what data and information should be considered for archiving as well as what data and information should be considered for retrieval.
ITS Application EntityASTM E2468–05Standard Practice for Metadata to Support Archived Data Management SystemsThis standard describes a hierarchical outline of sections and elements to be used in developing metadata to support archived data management systems. Specifically, the standard establishes the names of metadata elements and compound elements to be used in the metadata, the definitions of these metadata elements and compound elements, and suggested information about and examples of the values that are to be provided for the metadata elements.
ITS Application EntityASTM E2665–08Standard Specification for Archiving ITS–Generated Traffic Monitoring DataThis specification describes data elements and schema for an archived data management system for ITS–generated traffic monitoring data, including conventional traffic monitoring data, data collected directly from ITS systems, and travel–time data from probe vehicles. It establishes the names of the data elements, their interrelationships, and their procedural definitions. These procedural definitions include data collection instrumentation and methodology as well as recommended procedures for calculating traffic statistics.
Facilities Standard(s) need to be developedOne or more standards need to be developed for this subject matter before this is considered a complete solution.
TransNetIETF RFC 2460Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) SpecificationThis standard (RFC) specifies version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6), also sometimes referred to as IP Next Generation or IPng.
TransNetIETF RFC 4291IP Version 6 Addressing ArchitectureThis standard (RFC) defines the addressing architecture of the IP Version 6 (IPv6) protocol. It includes the IPv6 addressing model, text representations of IPv6 addresses, definition of IPv6 unicast addresses, anycast addresses, and multicast addresses, and an IPv6 node's required addresses.
TransNetIETF RFC 4443Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) SpecificationThis standard (RFC) defines the control messages to manage IPv6.
TransNetIETF RFC 793Transmission Control ProtocolThis standard (RFC) defines the main connection–oriented Transport Layer protocol used on Internet–based networks.
Access Internet Subnet AlternativesA set of alternative standards that includes any Subnet Layer method of connecting to the Internet.

Readiness: Lowest

Readiness Description

Many serious issues. This category includes solutions that have not been standardized, or do not have a basic level of interoperability or security. Consider selecting a different communications solution or if this is not possible (eg. a pilot of a new application that has not been standardized), take additional measures to provide an acceptable level of security or interoperability.

Issues

IssueSeverityDescriptionAssociated StandardAssociated Triple
Data profile not definedUltraPerformance, functionality, and the upper–layers of the OSI stack have not been defined for this information flow.(None)(All)

Supports Interfaces

SourceDestinationFlow
ETHRA Transportation Data ArchiveKnoxville Regional TPO Data Archivearchive coordination
KAT Transit Data ArchiveKnoxville Regional TPO Data Archivearchive coordination
Knox County CAC Transit Data ArchiveKnoxville Regional TPO Data Archivearchive coordination
Knoxville Regional TPO Data ArchiveETHRA Transportation Data Archivearchive coordination
Knoxville Regional TPO Data ArchiveKAT Transit Data Archivearchive coordination
Knoxville Regional TPO Data ArchiveKnox County CAC Transit Data Archivearchive coordination
Knoxville Regional TPO Data ArchiveTITAN Databasearchive coordination
TITAN DatabaseKnoxville Regional TPO Data Archivearchive coordination